Ethical Behavior and Ethical Lenses Of Baird Essay

Ethical Behavior and Ethical Lenses Of Baird - Essay ExampleThe ELI is sure to facilitate the self-discovery of is underlying values which help individuals to identify their favored approach to solving honest dilemmas. Ones personal code of ethics is shaped by ones family members, teachers, norms and regulations of the community, formal and informal education, philosophy, holiness and religion. Similarly, each profession and organization has its own estimable codes (values, expectations and set of preferences) which the employees have to follow. It is also important for individuals to identify the values in conflict through great self-knowledge. These values in conflict are the result of differences between ones personal and community values, conflicts as to which personal value should take priority in a given situation, and the disparity between ones best and worst selves. The ELI will also equip one to identify ones values in conflict and as such this paper seeks to address m y personal ethics statement based on Bairds good decision model. For Baird, the four basic values that form ones good behavior and determine ones primary ethical genus Lens are rationality, sensibility, autonomy and equality. Among these, rationality stresses on reason, principles, critical thinking and analysis sensibility emphasizes empathy and compassion where the individual follows his heart or intuition in ethical decisions autonomy favors personal rights and responsibilities in ethical behavior whereas equality takes into account the needs of the community in ethical choices (Baird & Niacaris 11). Analyzing my own ethical values it is plain that rationality stands at the middle of my ethical statement. I strongly believe in the power of reason, principles, critical thinking and analysis in making ethical choices. However, regarding the priority of values to be undertaken in various situations I stand divided between autonomy and equality. Even though I am a strong advocat e of equality and value the needs of the community I favor my personal rights and responsibilities as well in many instances. Therefore, I wee that there are certain conflicts of values with regard to my ethical decisions which I need to sort out carefully. It is also worthwhile to analyze the four ethical genus Lenses of Baird to have a thorough understanding regarding my own ethical perspectives. For Baird, ones value preferences determine ones ethical lens and thusly it is significant to identify my own meat values and the corresponding ethical lens. Baird categorizes the ethical lenses into four rights and responsibility lens, results lens, relationship lens, and reputation lens. The Rights and Responsibility Lens emphasizes the core values of autonomy and rationality and it holds that the individual is capable of making his own ethical choices through critical thinking and analysis. On the other hand, the Results Lens emphasizes the core values of autonomy and sensibility an d the focus of the individual is on the results or consequences of his actions. As such the ethical perspective has its roots in the teleological customs which stresses on utilitarianism. The third ethical perspective is the Relationship Lens that emphasizes the core values of equality and rationality, traditionally known as theories of justice and it has its roots in the deontological tradition. This ethical perspective exhorts one to treat everyone in the community with respect and dignity. On the other hand, the Reputation Lens emphasizes the values of equality and sensibility and the lens focuses on what virtues the community believes should be cultivated by those in positions of responsibility. With regard to my e