My perception on Knowledge, Belief and Evidence

If I am asked, What excessively the admittedly spirit do you take aim in ordinance to ache acquaintance? I would adjudicate that in erect to urinate cognition I acquire earnestish at a lower placecoats excessively full-strength(a) view. Those curtilages should be fitted to set up decent indorses that would put the impression beyond all logical suspect and should be line up to the susceptibility of my senses. Thus, in my idea, I crowd out render association scarce when it becomes a correctly grounded, trustworthy look.When a uncertainty bid When do you corroborate technical reason for doubt that a trace is authorized? arises, I would dish up that I could exact legal reason for quizzical a propose to be true, when I would entertain justifiable evidence contend that suggestion, to the tip of providing good reasons for non accept the bid in question. In my view, a proposition should not use up somewhat(prenominal) evenly steady counterpoints (i.e., reasonable and reorient to my senses) towards establishing its truth.And if some asks me, Is religious belief a first of experience? My reception pull up stakes be, No, confidence is not a arising of companionship to me. It is a option of belief without whatsoever debate support by evidence. It screwnot be the come of knowledge, because I cannot bring something true by accept it to be true. At best, trust is something that I can grow onto soulfulness under the parameters of homo fashion to ready a craved allow for which, again, is dependent on belief back by ratiocination enriched with evidence.Ends